NASA orchestrated the hoax ... through television. They had one picture which they completely controlled, black and white, grainy, that convinced everybody we were on the moon. We had no reason to doubt it. And they had complete reins over the pictures, over the sound. Bart Sibrel, investigative journalist
The reason why they couldn’t go to the moon is because of the phenomenon few people know about called the Van Allen radiation belts. Bart Sibrel
The crowning achievement of humankind. The greatest boast of the species. The event in human history most associated with pride in our own accomplishments: landing on the moon. Twenty years later and years behind schedule the same space program couldn’t put into Earth orbit a telescope with a lens that focused. And yet two decade earlier a mission one hundred times more complicated worked on its first occasion. With close scrutiny of the motives of the zealous Nixon administration. A critical examination of the entirely government-controlled press coverage. And newly discovered coverage of the crew of Apollo 11 staging part of their mission. We wish to detail what may come to be the greatest government conspiracy of all time: a funny thing happened on the way to the moon. Bart Sibrel, A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon, 2001
Unbeknownst to the citizenry, high above the Earth, beginning at an altitude of 1,000 miles and extending an additional 25,000 miles, lay lethal bands of radiation called the Van Allen Radiation Belts. Every space mission in history with humans on board, from both the United States and Soviet Union, from the first in 1961 to the present, has been well below this deadly radiation field ... All except Apollo. ibid.
There is only one full-bodied picture of him [Neil Armstrong] on the moon. ibid.
It is clear that these scenes were lit with artificial light. These shadows which are cast at different angles are evidence that a second light source is being used. ibid.
Obviously the only shielding they had was literally the paper-thin outer hull of aluminium, and their suits consisting of glass fibre, some aluminium fibres, and silicon rubber. Ralph Rene, author NASA Mooned America
A production, a showpiece if you will ... There is absolutely no way they went to the moon with what they had ... They [the landing craft] didn’t move dry dust, they didn’t move little rocks, they didn’t move anything ... You’re practically being bombarded with all this solar radiation smacking into you, which is why they had to hide the whole thing. Ralph Rene
Towards the end of 1966 the CIA intercepted a memo indicating that the Soviets were ready to put men on the moon. Nine cosmonauts had been training for several years. They had even landed Lunar 9 on the moon in January 1966. Dark Side of the Moon, Arte 2002
The huge cake represented by the space program was shared out according to classic mafia rules: three states, California, Texas and Florida monopolised everything. ibid.
It was Wernher von Braun who first realised the race to the moon must be entertaining. A show. After several meetings with Walt Disney an idea took shape. Only Hollywood, the dream factory itself, could transform a dull rocket launch that no-one took any notice of into a mega-production. And Stanley Kubrick was about to convince the last doubters. The famous director, working closely with NASA, had started to shoot 2001: A Space Odyssey. ibid.
Shortly after the three astronauts’ triumphant return to Earth ... Buzz Aldrin, the second man to walk on the moon, sank into a depression for no apparent reason. ibid.
It’s an incredible story. Newly elected Nixon was up to his neck in the Vietnam War. He needed a big stunt to reverse his negative image with the American public. ibid.
Donald Rumsfeld was the first to propose Stanley Kubrick ... In the end Kubrick agreed. The fake footage would be shot in England in the MGM studios near Borehamwood with a skeleton crew. ibid.
Of course we were worried to go out into the unknown of space. Of course we were fearful. We had no idea how a human would be affected by the radiation. We suspected that possibly the radiation could even penetrate through the craft itself. Boris Valentinovich Volynov
A representative of mankind may well have gone to the moon in 1969 ... Images of the Apollo landings are not a true and accurate record of such an event. In our view the Apollo pictures were faked. David S Percy, co-author Dark Moon: Apollo & The Whistleblowers
After the camera has zoomed in, surprisingly, something comes between the camera and the earth partly obscuring the view. Obviously this could not happen if they were shooting directly out of the window. David S Percy
It would be totally impossible for an object to get in front of the reticule on the developed image. David S Percy
Star Fish Prime: We suspect that with Operation Star Fish Prime – the explosion of a mega-ton nuclear bomb 248 miles above Earth – NASA was trying to force a corridor through this natural danger zone. But ended up making matters worse. David S Percy
NASA had another problem: and one is that the moon surface is totally inhospitable to man. If you do it in the dark, and that includes any part of the shadow of the space-craft itself, the temperatures go down to 250 degrees below zero. In the sun the temperatures go up to 250 degrees above zero. Paul R Renne, geochronologist
It’s a bit of a diversionary argument in my opinion – Did we land on the Moon? ... Is there more advanced technology than rocket technology that can go way beyond that in a secret space program? Richplanet TV with Andrew Johnson checktheevidence.com, Showcase 2, Richard D Hall
Whistleblowers such as Stan Deyo, Dr Edward Teller, they were looking at anti-gravity propulsion. ibid.
Apollo – Removing Truth’s Protective Layers – Explaining why, in the case of the moon landings, technology appears to have gone backwards: viz checktheevidence online. ibid.
The person who wrote the report and Gus Grissom ended up dead. ibid. Johnson
Jay Weidner: Kubrick’s Odyssey: Secrets hidden in the films of Stanley Kubrick. ibid.
Trackless rover photos: there wasn’t enough space for it to fit in the command module. ibid. Johnson
There’s no cooling systems on those rovers ... How did they maintain the internal temperature? ibid.
I don’t think Apollo 13 landed on the moon. ibid. Johnson
The argument over whether we landed with Apollo is a diversion ... from the secret space program and possibly that there is stuff on the moon. Richplanet TV: Andrew Johnson returns
These three guys all resigned shortly after they came back. ibid.
The man who was in the orbiting space craft ... Michael Collins was giving a live report back to NASA and he began to describe something that actually blew my socks off almost, and this was that he saw a large building – what appeared to be a man-made building below, and this was a tall building; I think he said seven storeys. Now, [for] eleven minutes he described what he was looking at around the moon. That eleven minutes was cut out of every other broadcast. Jonathan Gray, interview Coast to Coast Hidden Discoveries
The Chinese, way back around 2,000 B.C. – we’ve got their records; they’ve been handed down ... And they say that they send astronauts up to the moon. And like built structures up there like pagodas. ibid.
There are always going to be people who believe some outlandish theories, and the notion that we somehow were able to fake the lunar missions is pretty outlandish. Brian Welch, NASA spokesman
In the end there is one set of evidence that is irrefutable: and that is that there are foot-prints, boot-prints, still on the lunar surface. Brian Welch
I think the idea that the Apollo project was faked is demonstrably ridiculous. Dr Ian Crawford, University College London
It’s pointless trying to argue with them ... Any idea that it could have been faked is quite frankly insane. Patrick Moore, astronomer