NASA could not risk the public humiliation of having brave astronauts crashing to their deaths on the lunar surface broadcast on live TV. NASA’s Nazis knew that a major catastrophic failure on the moon would cause the billions of dollars of funding to be immediately cut. Anyone with the most elementary grasp of science could tell that the Saturn V rockets were merely big versions of the Nazi’s V2 killing machines. ibid.
For all the success and spin put on the Apollo moon missions in the late 1960s NASA has never fully answered the question, Why have they never returned to the moon? Some ex-NASA employees know the answer: and that is that the moon is crawling with aliens. Chris Everard, Secret Space II
In addition to luminous UFOs on the lunar surface, NASA recorded the existence of mysterious shadows. ibid.
Previous to the publication of the anomalous Lunar report, in 1965 NASA launched Operation Moonblink, a project involving top observatories all over planet Earth. NASA’s goal was to collect data on the large number of luminosities seen flying over the lunar surface. Operation Moonblink also investigated various large structures which had been photographed by unmanned NASA satellites. Some of these structures looked suspiciously artificial. ibid.
After looking carefully through hundreds of NASA photos returned to Earth by Orbiter 3 and its predecessor Orbiter 2, American author George Leonard published a book called Somebody Else is on the Moon. George Leonard presented many photos in his book, some showing very long tracks in the lunar dust. ibid.
NASA’s investment in studying UFOs on the moon was money well spent. Two ex-NASA mission specialists exposed in the 1970s that NASA astronauts had informed mission control that they had seen alien space-ships on the lunar surface. ibid.
There were many problems that evolved in the sixties that led people to believe that we were never going to make it to the moon. The whole thing then seemed phony to me. I think it was an intuitive feeling that what was being shown was not real. Bill Kaysing, former analyst & Rocketdyne engineer & company designer of Apollo rockets
They had to fake the moon landings because they knew successful trips to the moon and returns could not be made ... The footprint he was leaving was in Area 51 ... If they couldn’t get a simulator to work on Earth, how in the world could they get the actual lunar module to work on the moon? ... The shadows are one of the strong proofs we never went to the moon … Bill Kaysing
The chances of getting to the moon and returning safely to Earth was something like point 0.0017%. In other words virtually an impossibility. What actually happened in my mind is that during the sixties they said, If you can’t make it, fake it. Bill Kaysing
They simply orbited the Earth for eight days, and in the interim they showed these fake pictures of the astronauts on the moon. But on the eighth day the command console separated from the vehicle and descended to Earth as of course was shown in films. Bill Kaysing
It was technically impossible to do it, and they simply had to come up with some sort of alternative that they felt the public would believe. Bill Kaysing
How would it be possible to hear astronauts’ voices against the background of a running rocket engine? Bill Kaysing
The fact that there is no blast crater under the LEM is one of the most conclusive pieces of evidence that I find supporting the hoax. Then there’s one other point: if they had truly landed on the moon, this dust would have then descended on the lunar lander, on the foot pads, and we find not a trace of dust on the foot pads. Bill Kaysing
In the footage of the ascent stage going up, what you don’t see is an exhaust plume coming out of the rocket engine nozzle. But what do we see? We see the ascent stage suddenly pop up without any exhaust plume whatsoever, as though it were jerked by a cable. Bill Kaysing
All of the photographs were faked ... The pictures that we see that allegedly were taken on the moon are absolutely perfect. Unfortunately, errors were made which are now being discovered. Bill Kaysing
The fact that the flag flaps on the moon where there is no atmosphere means that there must have been a little blast of wind over in Area 51 where they shot this. Bill Kaysing
The astronauts were protected by a thin film of aluminium, when here on Earth they put a lead shield on us when they take a dental X-ray. Bill Kaysing
What happened to all the dust that was tipped up by the engines? Bill Kaysing
Those photographs can be demonstrated not to have been taken on the lunar surface. Marcus Allen, Nexus Magazine
It could well be that what we are looking at are films of realistic models. We have no means of knowing if they were actually taken on the lunar surface or whether what we are watching is part of the simulation exercise and the training exercise. Marcus Allen
It is fact. It is fiction. It’s mixed together. It’s hard to separate them unless you examine it closely. Marcus Allen
It was filmed in a TV studio. There’s absolutely no doubts whatsoever about that. And the way that this film was created was by the use of models. Marcus Allen
Every single mission was filmed and photographed here on Earth. It was called a training exercise. It was called a simulation. Marcus Allen, interview Theo Chalmers, On the Edge
The photographs and the films that we have watched I’d say were taken here on Earth during the training and simulation exercises. ibid.
There is a big mystery as to how it got to the moon because there is no photograph, film or TV of the Rover being unloaded from the Apollo lunar lander. ibid.
In some, areas lit from behind which should be in deep shadow are bright and perfectly visible. In other pictures the shadows are at near right-angles suggesting two separate light sources. Perhaps most surprisingly there are no stars in the Apollo photographs even though they were taken from space. When the archive film is sped up the astronauts appear to be running at normal speed in terrestrial gravity. And why does the flag appear to be fluttering in the breeze even though there is no wind on the moon? ... The conspiracy theorists believe radiation is the final nail in the coffin. The Truth behind the Moon Landings, Discovery 2003
But it’s evidence the astronauts left behind not what they brought back that may finally prove the sceptics wrong. Each mission set up a series of experiments; more than thirty years after the Apollo 11 mission one of them continues to function: the Lunar Laser Ranger ... High up in the McDavis Mountain range the McDonald Observatory in Texas still gathers information from those reflectors ... Since 1969 his [Jerry Wiant the chief engineer] team has been firing a laser beam at the experiment on average 240 times a year. ibid.
Perhaps the final proof is this: compared to difficulties involved in sustaining such an elaborate scam, wouldn’t it be so much easier to build a rocket and fly to the moon? ibid.
The NASA pictures ... analysed contain many inconsistencies, a whole core of which have no rational explanation or excuse. Dr David Groves, physicist & holographic computer image analyst
It was Kodak film, and the sensitisation of the film was essentially the same as ordinary film at that time. H J P Arnold, Kodak 1966-1974
If some of the film was spoiled, it’s remotely possible they [NASA] may have shot some scenes in a studio environment to avoid embarrassment. Brian O’Leary, astronaut, first UFO conference Hawaii
I can’t say 100% for sure whether these men walked on the moon. It’s possible that NASA could have covered it up. Just in order to cut corners and to be the first to allegedly go to the moon. Brian O’Leary, NASA astronaut
3A magnetic storm will come along and that can increase the intensity of the radiation belts by maybe a thousand times above what it was before. Dr Geoffrey Reeves, space physicist
How were they able to design a craft on Earth that would perform so well under quite different conditions on the moon, namely, in a vacuum in one sixth gravity without killing anyone? Apollo Zero, 2009
In the sunlit areas the temperature on the surface of the moon is 250 degree Fahrenheit ... The astronauts had no energy source that would have enabled them to reject the sun’s heat. ibid.
What about the moon rocks, the laser reflector discs and the photographs of astronauts on the moon? The Apollo samples are not rocks gathered during moon walks ... The December 1966 issue of National Geographic explains why no such reflectors are needed to bounce signals off the moon ... The photographs also fail under critical analysis: there are flags waving in the wind even though the moon sits in a vacuum ... Just the sheer perfection of the set-ups and appearances of the photos ... There is no fog on the film from immense temperature variations, no discolouration from radiation, no lightning streaks from micro-meteorites passing by. ibid.