Police shot bombers, reports New Zealander. World Story news online report
It’s [7/7] a very convenient way of ensuring there is fear, of ensuring that there is control and of ensuring that those who are in the know – and of course we cannot tell you because it is all secret – are in a position of extreme power. Michael Meacher MP
Blair rejects 7/7 inquiry calls: Tony Blair has again rejected calls for a fresh inquiry into the 7/7 attacks, saying it would undermine the security services. BBC online news
A passenger commented that King’s Cross was only a ten-minute walk. Lots of people got off. A tall black man was the only person left standing on the bottom deck. BBC online witness statement re 30 bus
Relatives of 7 July bombers denied legal aid. BBC online 22 April 2010
We know that these people act in the name of Islam. Tony Blair, news conference after bombings & after rozzers said in press conference they didn’t know who was responsible
We know we need strict controls in a changing world. Tony Blair
I do accept that the people want to know exactly what happened – and we will make sure that they do ... We will publish a full account of all the information we have ... We will bring together all the evidence that we have and publish it so that the people, the victims and others can see exactly what happened. Tony Blair, 14th December 2005
cf.
What the British public have been presented with is in fact a complex but contradictory series of lies. Ludicrous Diversion: 7/7 Bombings
We’ve been told an inquiry would prejudice the current investigation. We’ve been told an enquiry would prevent the police and government from focusing on future attacks [sic] ... Take too much time, cost too much money and divert resources away from the War on Terrorism ... And we have been told by the prime minister himself that a public enquiry would be a ludicrous diversion. ibid. citing ministers’ statements
Identifying documentation for Mohammad Sidique Khan was for some reason found at three out of the four bombsites; or the issue of what explosives were used, something that incredibly is described in the narrative as ‘still under expert examination’ more than a year after the attacks; or the fake Al Qaeda confession released on the internet a few hours after the attacks through a server in Texas; or the training exercises taking place in London that day based on a scenario of bombs going off at the exact same times and the exact same stations as the attacks occurred; or the huge amount of money made in speculating the rise and fall of Sterling the result of either foreknowledge of the event or extraordinary luck; or the arrest of Haroon Aswat widely reported by the UK media as being the mastermind behind the attacks, and by the US media of being an agent for MI5; or the strange mistake regarding the time of the train taken by the men from Luton that morning – the police, the press and the government narrative all reported that the men took the 7:40 departure; but as discovered by bloggers and the alternative media the 7:40 was cancelled that day. ibid.
6Like most of the evidence purported to condemn these men, Khan’s Will and Testament has never been shown to the public and has therefore never been scrutinised or confirmed to be real. Khan’s video confession makes no actual reference to him blowing himself up and is said by people who knew him to show him several years ago and has never been shown in its entirety. Since the narrative’s release, we have also seen a video by Shehzad Tanweer. Again, Tanweer makes no reference to his suicide, and we have never seen the whole film. Even if these videos are genuine, they are not evidence that the men were responsible for the London bombings. If there is no evidence of remote detonation at the bombsites, why did the New York police, based on what the British police had told them, report at a conference, the bombs were set off using mobile phones? The same remote timing devices used in the Madrid bombings in 2004. The eye-witness’ accounts of the bombers fiddling with their rucksacks are extremely dubious. ibid.
No CCTV footage has been released to the public; all we have seen are three still images: one shows Hussain alone entering the ticket hall at Luton Station, inexplicably cropped so it does not show the other three men who should all be around him; the second shows Hussain again alone outside Boots in King’s Cross Station apparently at 9 a.m. ten minutes after he was supposed to be dead and at a time when Kings Cross Station was being evacuated; and the third shows four figures entering Luton Station, three of whom have blurred faces but only Hussain is actually identifiable. There are no images of the four men together in London. In fact there are no images of any of the train bombers in London that day at all. ibid.
The car in which they travelled to Luton is said to have contained explosive devices but it’s never been explained why the men would have left them there when embarking on a suicide mission. The devices were reportedly destroyed in controlled explosions. ibid.
The bombers are all certain to have been caught on many cameras during their journey to and on the underground ... They were not masked, so we will end up with very good pictures that will identify them. Andy Hayman, Assistant Police Commissioner
TFL [Transport for London] are advising people to avoid the entire tube network after a major power failure. British Transport Police says power surge incidents have caused a series of bangs on the London Underground. BBC Radio London 10.00 a.m.
Why did the government say the bombers travelled on a train that never ran? What was this van from a controlled demolition firm doing next to the blown-up bus? Were these men suicide bombers or were they framed? The Conspiracy Files, BBC 2009
Some of those on board were telling a Guardian journalist of how an explosion had come from beneath the train. ibid.
Six weeks after the event, we found that ... all the trains that morning were severely delayed due to overhead power troubles in the North Hill area ... The 7:40 had not run that day, which the whole government case had been predicated on them catching the train that day ... It wasn’t just the train they got wrong, it was the whole fabricated story. The four did not meet up in the car park, did not catch the train to London that morning. Dr Nick Kollerstrom, private investigator & discoverer of ghost train that never ran
What are the chances of three London Underground train stations being targeted on the same day at the same time as three ‘terror drills’ with almost the exact same scenario being acted out? PSTV.tv – Kollerstrom & Farrell
Mr Richard Jones – everything was wrong with his story. ibid.
The head of MOSAD in a German newspaper clearly stating that they had advance information. ibid.
Rudolph Giuliani – what was he doing in London? ibid.
The Jaguar at Luton Car Park ... a dummy run, a practice run, on 28th June, the week before, show that that Jaguar was also there on the same spot. A minder who was there to meet those lads. ibid.
What were the bombs? ... black pepper and peroxide? ibid.
The Edgware Road underground train ... Three large holes in its floor. The damage did not resemble that from a rucksack within the coach. ibid.
... 6 at Edgware Road, 7 at Aldgate ... Those dead bodies are totally accounted for by real human victims; what that means is there isn’t one left over who could be the terrorist. ibid.
They were just ordinary normal lads. ibid.
A couple of weeks later – John Charles de Menezes ... Another police killing; a whole pack of lies told around it. ibid.
As a matter of fact CCTV cameras on the buses get maintained two times a week. And can digitally store up to two-weeks’ footage. It’s highly unlikely all cameras would malfunction at the same time. I personally saw the footage from all cameras on Bus 30, registration LX03 BUF. They were working on that day and I was the first to recover the footage. I personally saw no Asian man of that description. Andy Simpson, Stagecoach Security Manager, televised interview
It is becoming more and more clear that the story presented to the public and parliament is at odds with the facts. David Davis, former Shadow Home Secretary
Blair initially said that any such enquiry would be a ludicrous diversion in the struggle against terrorism. 7/7: The Big Picture
Accounts of what happened on July 7th are contrasting and varied. Nothing we’ve been officially told makes any sense. ibid.
The four British Muslim men allegedly responsible may have themselves been victims of a much larger conspiracy. ibid.
There is virtually no forensic physical evidence in the public domain. ibid.
The 7.48 train would not have got the four to London in time to catch the tube trains they supposedly bombed. ibid.
The 7.40 train was cancelled that morning. ibid.
In the frames from Woodhall Motorway Services Shehzad Tanweer is clearly shown wearing white trousers. But in the pictures of the four men entering Luton Station Tanweer’s trousers are black. ibid.
In the footage of the four going through the ticket barrier and down on to the platform the time-codes are largely blurred out. ibid.
Exactly what happened to the tube trains on the morning of July 7th isn’t at all clear. The number of explosions, when and where they took place and what caused them are all disputed, with official sources often contradicting each other. ibid.
Exactly where in the carriages the explosions took place is difficult to establish. ibid.
Many eye-witness reports are more consistent with an explosion underneath the train. Comments published by the BBC describe a large hole in the floor, manholes blown out and the floor ripped open. ibid.