Call us:
0-9
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
  Dagestan  ·  Dagger  ·  Dagon  ·  Dam  ·  Damage  ·  Damn & Damnation  ·  Dance & Dancer  ·  Danger & Dangerous  ·  Daniel (Bible)  ·  Daoism & Taoism  ·  Dare  ·  Dark & Darkness  ·  Dark Ages  ·  Dark Energy  ·  Dark Matter  ·  Darts  ·  Darwin, Charles  ·  Data  ·  Date (Romance)  ·  Date (Time)  ·  Daughter  ·  David (Bible)  ·  Dawn  ·  Day  ·  Dead & Death (I)  ·  Dead & Death (II)  ·  Dead Sea Scrolls  ·  Deal  ·  Death Penalty & Death Sentence  ·  Debate  ·  Deborah (Bible)  ·  Debt  ·  Decadence  ·  Decay  ·  Deceit & Deception  ·  Decency  ·  Decision  ·  Deconstruction  ·  Deed  ·  Defeat  ·  Defect  ·  Defence & Defense  ·  Definition  ·  Deformity  ·  Déjà Vu  ·  Delaware  ·  Delay  ·  Delusion  ·  Dementia  ·  Democracy (I)  ·  Democracy (II)  ·  Democrats & Democrat Party  ·  Demon  ·  Demonstrations  ·  Denmark & Danes  ·  Dentist & Dentistry  ·  Denver & Denver Airport  ·  Deny & Denial  ·  Depart & Leave  ·  Depression  ·  Descendant  ·  Desert  ·  Design  ·  Desire  ·  Despair & Desperation  ·  Despot & Despotism  ·  Destiny  ·  Destroy & Destruction  ·  Detective  ·  Detention  ·  Determination  ·  Detox  ·  Detroit  ·  Development  ·  Devil  ·  Diamond  ·  Diana, Princess  ·  Diary  ·  Dictator & Dictatorship  ·  Dictionary  ·  Diego Garcia  ·  Diet  ·  Difference & Different  ·  Dignity  ·  Diligence & Diligent  ·  Dimension  ·  Dinner  ·  Dinosaur & Dinosaurs  ·  Diplomacy & Diplomat  ·  Dirt  ·  Disability  ·  Disappearances & Vanishings (I)  ·  Disappearances & Vanishings (II)  ·  Disappointment  ·  Disaster (I)  ·  Disaster (II)  ·  Disbelief  ·  Discipline  ·  Disco  ·  Discovery  ·  Discretion  ·  Discrimination  ·  Disease  ·  Disgrace & Dishonour  ·  Disguise  ·  Disney  ·  Dispute  ·  Dissent  ·  Diversity  ·  Divide & Division  ·  Divine & Divinity  ·  Diving  ·  Divorce  ·  DMT (Dimethyltryptamine)  ·  DNA  ·  Do & Done  ·  Docks & Dockers  ·  Doctor  ·  Doctrine  ·  Documentary  ·  Dog  ·  Dogma  ·  Dogon  ·  Dollar & Dollar Bill  ·  Dolphin  ·  Domestic Violence  ·  Dominican Republic  ·  Donkey  ·  Door  ·  Doping  ·  Doubt  ·  Dowsing  ·  Dracula  ·  Dragon  ·  Dragon's Triangle  ·  Drama  ·  Drawing  ·  Dream  ·  Drink  ·  Drone  ·  Drown & Drowning  ·  Drugs (I)  ·  Drugs (II)  ·  Drugs (III)  ·  Druids  ·  Drunk  ·  Dubai  ·  Dublin  ·  Duck  ·  Duel  ·  Dull  ·  Dust  ·  Duty  ·  Dwarf & Dwarfism  ·  Dzopa & Dropa  
<D>
Darwin, Charles
D
  Dagestan  ·  Dagger  ·  Dagon  ·  Dam  ·  Damage  ·  Damn & Damnation  ·  Dance & Dancer  ·  Danger & Dangerous  ·  Daniel (Bible)  ·  Daoism & Taoism  ·  Dare  ·  Dark & Darkness  ·  Dark Ages  ·  Dark Energy  ·  Dark Matter  ·  Darts  ·  Darwin, Charles  ·  Data  ·  Date (Romance)  ·  Date (Time)  ·  Daughter  ·  David (Bible)  ·  Dawn  ·  Day  ·  Dead & Death (I)  ·  Dead & Death (II)  ·  Dead Sea Scrolls  ·  Deal  ·  Death Penalty & Death Sentence  ·  Debate  ·  Deborah (Bible)  ·  Debt  ·  Decadence  ·  Decay  ·  Deceit & Deception  ·  Decency  ·  Decision  ·  Deconstruction  ·  Deed  ·  Defeat  ·  Defect  ·  Defence & Defense  ·  Definition  ·  Deformity  ·  Déjà Vu  ·  Delaware  ·  Delay  ·  Delusion  ·  Dementia  ·  Democracy (I)  ·  Democracy (II)  ·  Democrats & Democrat Party  ·  Demon  ·  Demonstrations  ·  Denmark & Danes  ·  Dentist & Dentistry  ·  Denver & Denver Airport  ·  Deny & Denial  ·  Depart & Leave  ·  Depression  ·  Descendant  ·  Desert  ·  Design  ·  Desire  ·  Despair & Desperation  ·  Despot & Despotism  ·  Destiny  ·  Destroy & Destruction  ·  Detective  ·  Detention  ·  Determination  ·  Detox  ·  Detroit  ·  Development  ·  Devil  ·  Diamond  ·  Diana, Princess  ·  Diary  ·  Dictator & Dictatorship  ·  Dictionary  ·  Diego Garcia  ·  Diet  ·  Difference & Different  ·  Dignity  ·  Diligence & Diligent  ·  Dimension  ·  Dinner  ·  Dinosaur & Dinosaurs  ·  Diplomacy & Diplomat  ·  Dirt  ·  Disability  ·  Disappearances & Vanishings (I)  ·  Disappearances & Vanishings (II)  ·  Disappointment  ·  Disaster (I)  ·  Disaster (II)  ·  Disbelief  ·  Discipline  ·  Disco  ·  Discovery  ·  Discretion  ·  Discrimination  ·  Disease  ·  Disgrace & Dishonour  ·  Disguise  ·  Disney  ·  Dispute  ·  Dissent  ·  Diversity  ·  Divide & Division  ·  Divine & Divinity  ·  Diving  ·  Divorce  ·  DMT (Dimethyltryptamine)  ·  DNA  ·  Do & Done  ·  Docks & Dockers  ·  Doctor  ·  Doctrine  ·  Documentary  ·  Dog  ·  Dogma  ·  Dogon  ·  Dollar & Dollar Bill  ·  Dolphin  ·  Domestic Violence  ·  Dominican Republic  ·  Donkey  ·  Door  ·  Doping  ·  Doubt  ·  Dowsing  ·  Dracula  ·  Dragon  ·  Dragon's Triangle  ·  Drama  ·  Drawing  ·  Dream  ·  Drink  ·  Drone  ·  Drown & Drowning  ·  Drugs (I)  ·  Drugs (II)  ·  Drugs (III)  ·  Druids  ·  Drunk  ·  Dubai  ·  Dublin  ·  Duck  ·  Duel  ·  Dull  ·  Dust  ·  Duty  ·  Dwarf & Dwarfism  ·  Dzopa & Dropa  

★ Darwin, Charles

Animals, whom we have made our slaves, we do not like to consider our equal.  Charles Darwin, Notebook B

 

 

Man comes from one stock.  This leads one into many speculations.  Charles Darwin field notes

 

 

What a book a devil’s chaplain might write on the clumsy, wasteful, blundering, low, and horridly cruel works of nature!  Charles Darwin, letter to J D Hooker 13th July 1856

 

 

Her joyousness and animal spirits radiated from her whole countenance and rendered every movement elastic and full of life and vigour.  It was delightful and cheerful to behold her.  Her dear face now rises.  Charles Darwin, notebook, re Annie

 

 

We have lost the joy of the household and the solace of our old age.  Charles Darwin, re death of beloved daughter Annie from painful bout of Scarlet Fever

 

 

When I am dead know how many times I have kissed and cried over this.  Charles Darwin

 

 

I have never been an atheist in the sense of denying the existence of a God.  – I think that generally ... an agnostic would be the most correct description of my state of mind.  Charles Darwin

 

 

When the views entertained in this volume on the origin of species, or when analogous views are generally admitted, we can dimly foresee that there will be a considerable revolution in natural history.  Charles Darwin, On the Origin of Species

 

As many more individuals of each species are born than can possibly survive; and as, consequently, there is a frequently recurring struggle for existence, it follows that any being, if it vary however slightly in any manner profitable to itself, under the complex and sometimes varying conditions of life, will have a better chance of surviving, and thus be naturally selected.  From the strong principle of inheritance, any selected variety will tend to propagate its new and modified form.  ibid.  Introduction p5  

 

It will be seen that I look at the term species, as one arbitrarily given for the sake of convenience to a set of individuals closely resembling each other, and that it does not essentially differ from the term variety, which is given to less distinct and more fluctuating forms.  The term variety, again, in comparison with mere individual differences, is also applied arbitrarily, and for mere convenience sake.  ibid.  ch2 p52

 

Owing to this struggle for life, any variation, however slight and from whatever cause proceeding, if it be in any degree profitable to an individual of any species, in its infinitely complex relations to other organic beings and to external nature, will tend to the preservation of that individual, and will generally be inherited by its offspring.  The offspring, also, will thus have a better chance of surviving, for, of the many individuals of any species which are periodically born, but a small number can survive.  I have called this principle, by which each slight variation, if useful, is preserved, by the term of Natural Selection, in order to mark its relation to man’s power of selection.  ibid.  chIII p61

 

Natural selection is daily and hourly scrutinising throughout the world every variation even the slightest, rejecting that which is bad, preserving and adding up all that is good, silently and insensibly working.  We see nothing of these slow changes in progress until the hand of time has marked the laps of ages.  ibid.

 

It is interesting to contemplate an entangled bank clothed with many plants of many kinds, with birds singing in the bushes, and various insects flitting about, and with worms crawling through the damp Earth and reflect that these elaborately constructed forms, so different from each other, and yet so dependent on each other in so complex a manner, have all been produced by laws acting around us.  Thus, from the war of Nature, from famine and death, the most exalted object we can think of conceiving, namely, the production of higher animals directly follows.  There is grandeur in this view of Life, with its several powers having been originally breathed into a few forms or into one, and that whilst this planet has gone cycling along according to the fixed law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been and are being evolved.  ibid.

 

We behold the face of Nature bright with gladness.  Every single organic being around us may be seen to be striving to the utmost to increase in numbers.  That each lives by a struggle at some period of its life.  That heavy destruction inevitably falls either upon the young or old during each generation or at recurrent intervals.  The face of Nature may be compared to a yielding surface with ten thousand sharp wedges packed close together and driven inwards by incessant blows.  Sometimes one wedge being struck and then another with greater force.  ibid. 

 

Authors of the highest eminence seem to be fully satisfied with the view that each species has been independently created.  To my mind it accords better with what we know of the laws impressed on matter by the Creator, that the production and extinction of the past and present inhabitants of the world should have been due to secondary causes, like those determining the birth and death of the individual.  When I view all beings not as special creations, but as the lineal descendants of some few beings which lived long before the first bed of the Silurian system was deposited, they seem to me to become ennobled.  ibid. 

 

Light will be thrown on the origin of man and his history.  ibid.

 

 

It has often and confidently been asserted, that mans origin can never be known: but ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge: it is those who know little, and not those who know much, who so positively assert that this or that problem will never be solved by science.  Charles Darwin, The Descent of Man, Introduction p3    

 

Man bears in his bodily structure clear traces of his descent from some lower form; but it may be urged that, as man differs so greatly in his mental power from all other animals, there must be some error in this conclusion.  No doubt the difference in this respect is enormous, even if we compare the mind of one of the lowest savages, who has no words to express any number higher than four, and who uses no abstract terms for the commonest objects or affections, with that of the most highly organised ape.  ibid.  chII p34  

 

My object in this chapter is solely to shew that there is no fundamental difference between man and the higher mammals in their mental faculties.  ibid.  chII  p35

 

Belief in God – Religion – There is no evidence that man was aboriginally endowed with the ennobling belief in the existence of an Omnipotent God.  On the contrary there is ample evidence, derived not from hasty travellers, but from men who have long resided with savages, that numerous races have existed, and still exist, who have no idea of one or more gods, and who have no words in their languages to express such an idea.  The question is of course wholly distinct from that higher one, whether there exists a Creator and Ruler of the universe; and this has been answered in the affirmative by some of the highest intellects that have ever existed.

 

The belief in God has often been advanced as not only the greatest, but the most complete of all the distinctions between man and the lower animals.  It is however impossible, as we have seen, to maintain that this belief is innate or instinctive in man.  On the other hand a belief in all-pervading spiritual agencies seems to be universal; and apparently follows from a considerable advance in man's reason, and from a still greater advance in his faculties of imagination, curiosity and wonder.  I am aware that the assumed instinctive belief in God has been used by many persons as an argument for His existence.  But this is a rash argument, as we should thus be compelled to believe in the existence of many cruel and malignant spirits, only a little more powerful than man; for the belief in them is far more general than in a beneficent Deity.  The idea of a universal and beneficent Creator does not seem to arise in the mind of man, until he has been elevated by long-continued culture.  ibid.

 

Man with all his noble qualities, with sympathy which feels for the most debased, with benevolence which extends not only to other men but to the humblest living creature, with his god-like intellect which has penetrated into the movements and constitution of the solar system – with all these exalted powers – Man still bears in his bodily frame the indelible stamp of his lowly origin.  ibid.

 

Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge: it is those who know little, not those who know much, who so positively assert that this or that problem will never be solved by science.  ibid. 

 

 

During these two years (i.e. October 1836 to January 1839) I was led to think much about religion.  Whilst on board the Beagle I was quite orthodox, and I remember being heartily laughed at by several of the officers (though themselves orthodox) for quoting the Bible as an unanswerable authority on some point of morality.  I suppose it was the novelty of the argument that amused them.  But I had gradually come, by this time, to see that the Old Testament from its manifestly false history of the world, with the Tower of Babel, the rainbow as a sign, etc., etc., and from its attributing to God the feelings of a revengeful tyrant, was no more to be trusted than the sacred books of the Hindoos, or the beliefs of any barbarian.  The question then continually rose before my mind and would not be banished, – is it credible that if God were now to make a revelation to the Hindoos, would he permit it to be connected with the belief in Vishnu, Siva, & c., as Christianity is connected with the Old Testament.  This appeared to me utterly incredible ...

 

I gradually came to disbelieve in Christianity as a divine revelation.  The fact that many false religions have spread over large portions of the earth like wild-fire had some weight with me.  Beautiful as is the morality of the New Testament, it can hardly be denied that its perfection depends in part on the interpretation which we now put on metaphors and allegories.

 

But I was very unwilling to give up my belief.  Charles Darwin, Autobiography: Religious Belief

 

Thus disbelief crept over me at a very slow rate, but was at last complete. The rate was so slow that I felt no distress, and have never since doubted even for a single second that my conclusion was correct.  I can indeed hardly see how anyone ought to wish Christianity to be true; for if so the plain language of the text seems to show that the men who do not believe, and this would include my Father, Brother and almost all my best friends, will be everlastingly punished.

 

And this is a damnable doctrine.  ibid.

 

This very old argument from the existence of suffering against the existence of an intelligent first cause seems to me a strong one; whereas, as just remarked, the presence of much suffering agrees well with the view that all organic beings have been developed through variation and natural selection.

 

At the present day the most usual argument for the existence of an intelligent God is drawn from the deep inward conviction and feelings which are experienced by most persons.  But it cannot be doubted that Hindoos, Mahomadans and others might argue in the same manner and with equal force in favour of the existence of one God, or of many Gods, or as with the Buddists of no God.  There are also many barbarian tribes who cannot be said with any truth to believe in what we call God: they believe indeed in spirits or ghosts, and it can be explained, as Tyler and Herbert Spencer have shown, how such a belief would be likely to arise.

4